Urethral catheterization outcomes and complications in acute urinary retention: a systematic review of emergency department studies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65759/wcpfx583Keywords:
Acute Urinary Retention, Urethral Catheterization, Re-Catheterization, Urinary Catheter ComplicationsAbstract
Background: Acute urinary retention (AUR) is a common emergency condition managed by immediate urethral catheterization (UC), and data on catheter-related complications is less developed than post-catheter voiding outcomes. This systematic review aims to analyze original studies on outcomes and complications of UC in adults with AUR.
Methods: Original studies were identified from PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Embase. Eligible studies included adults with AUR managed with UC in ED or acute-care settings and reporting catheter-related complications, trial without catheter (TWOC), re-catheterization, or related clinical outcomes. Findings were synthesized qualitatively.
Results: Eight original studies were included. Most studies focused on TWOC success and predictors rather than direct catheter harms. Reported TWOC success ranged from 28.3% to 68.6%, and improved in some studies with alpha-blocker therapy. Factors associated with better voiding outcomes include lower retained urine volume, smaller prostate size, younger age, and lower intravesical prostatic protrusion. Direct complications were less reported, and one comparative cohort showed higher rates of urinary tract infection (UTI), urethral stricture (US), epididymo-orchitis, and septicemia after UC than suprapubic drainage (SPD). Rapid bladder decompression was not associated with important excess hypotension or severe hematuria.
Conclusion: UC effectively relieves AUR, and direct complication outcomes still underreported. Future emergency-based studies should assess catheter-related infective and traumatic complications more systematically alongside TWOC outcomes in practice.
References
1. Emberton M, Anson K. Clinical review Fortnightly review Acute urinary retention in men: an age old problem. n.d.
2. Choong S, Emberton M. Acute urinary retention. BJU Int. 2000 Jan;85(2):186-201. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.2000.00409.x. PMID: 10671867.
3. Christensen VS, Skow M, Flottorp SA, Strømme H, Mdala I, Vallersnes OM. Immediate or delayed trial without catheter in acute urinary retention in males: A systematic review. BJUI Compass 2024;5:732–47. https://doi.org/10.1002/bco2.369.
4. Roehrborn CG. Acute urinary retention: risks and management. Rev Urol. 2005;7 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):S31-41. PMID: 16986053; PMCID: PMC1477606.
5. Hollingsworth JM, Rogers MAM, Krein SL, Hickner A, Kuhn L, Cheng A, et al. Determining the Noninfectious Complications of Indwelling Urethral Catheters A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. 2013.
6. Taube M, Gajraj H. Trial without Catheter following Acute Retention of Urine 1989;63:180–2. https://doi.org/10.00.
7. Mcneill SA, Daruwala PD, Mitchell IDC, Shearer MG, Hargreave TB. Sustained-release alfuzosin and trial without catheter after acute urinary retention: a prospective, placebo-controlled trial. vol. 84. 1999.
8. Mahadik P, Vaddi SP, Godala CM, Vijaya Kumar Reddy V, Sambar VK. Factors affecting trial without catheter for first spontaneous acute urinary retention. Int Neurourol J 2013;17:121–6. https://doi.org/10.5213/inj.2013.17.3.121.
9. Syazarina ShariS O, Zainuddin zulkifli M, Hamid hamzaini A. Predicting Outcome of Trial of Voiding Without Catheter in Acute Urinary Retention with Intravesical Prostatic Protrusion. n.d.
10. Horgan AF, Prasad B, Waldron DJ, O’sullivan DC. Acute Urinary Retention. Comparison of Suprapubic and Urethral Catheterisation. vol. 70. 1992.
11. Etafy MH, Saleh FH, Ortiz-Vanderdys C, Hamada A, Refaat AM, Aal MA, et al. Rapid versus gradual bladder decompression in acute urinary retention. Urol Ann 2017;9:339–42. https://doi.org/10.4103/0974-7796.216320.
12. Wu MY, Chang JR, Lee YK, Lin PC, Tsai TY. The Effect and Safety of Rapid and Gradual Urinary Decompression in Urine Retention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Medicina (Lithuania) 2022;58. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina58101441.
13. Lucas MG, Stephenson TP, Nargund V. Tamsulosin in the management of patients in acute urinary retention from benign prostatic hyperplasia. BJU Int 2005;95:354–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2005.05299.x.
14. Gopi SS, Goodman CM, Robertson A, Byrne DJ. A prospective pilot study to validate the management protocol for patients presenting with acute urinary retention: a community-based, nonhospitalised protocol. ScientificWorldJournal 2006;6:2436–41. https://doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2006.379.
15. Sabir Khan H, Nadeem Azam Khan M, Malik G. TRIAL WITHOUT CATHETER: WHAT PREDICTS THE OUTCOME IN ACUTE URINARY RETENTION? vol. 14. 2018.
16. Kumar V, Mark C, Bhuvangiri A, Irwin P. A prospective study of conservatively managed acute urinary retention: Prostate size matters. BJU Int 2000;86:816–9. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1464-410X.2000.00918.x.
