Live birth outcomes after cleavage-stage (day 3) versus blastocyst-stage (day 5) embryo transfer in IVF/ICSI cycles: a systematic review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65759/ytqcsv22Abstract
Background: The optimal timing of embryo transfer in IVF/ICSI is controversial. Although blastocyst transfer improve fresh-cycle success through embryo selection, its effect on cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) is uncertain. In this study we aimed to compare live birth outcomes after Day 3 cleavage-stage versus Day 5 blastocyst-stage embryo transfer in IVF/ICSI cycles. Methods: A PRISMA-guided systematic review was conducted using PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Eligible studies included women undergoing fresh or frozen-thawed IVF/ICSI cycles comparing Day 5/6 blastocyst transfer with Day 2/3 cleavage-stage transfer. Results: Seven studies were included. In women with a good prognosis blastocyst transfer was associated with higher live birth rates in fresh cycles. Recent large studies showed no significant difference in CLBR between blastocyst and cleavage-stage policies. In women with four or fewer zygotes, blastocyst transfer provided no advantage, while cleavage-stage quality is a predictive of success among transferred blastocysts. Conclusion: Blastocyst transfer benefit good-prognosis patients, but it does not improve cumulative live birth outcomes in IVF/ICSI populations. Embryo transfer timing should be individualized, with cleavage-stage transfer favored in patients with low embryo yield to reduce cycle cancellation risk.
References
1) Papanikolaou EG, D'haeseleer E, Verheyen G, Van de Velde H, Camus M, Van Steirteghem A, Devroey P, Tournaye H. Live birth rate is significantly higher after blastocyst transfer than after cleavage-stage embryo transfer when at least four embryos are available on day 3 of embryo culture. A randomized prospective study. Hum Reprod. 2005 Nov;20(11):3198-203.
2) De Croo I, Colman R, De Sutter P, Stoop D, Tilleman K. No difference in cumulative live birth rates between cleavage versus blastocyst transfer in patients with four or fewer zygotes: results from a retrospective study. Hum Reprod Open. 2022 Jul 26;2022(3):hoac031.
3) Wang SS, Sun HX. Blastocyst transfer ameliorates live birth rate compared with cleavage-stage embryos transfer in fresh in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles: reviews and meta-analysis. Yonsei Med J. 2014 May;55(3):815-25.
4) Yin Y, Chen G, Li K, Liao Q, Zhang S, Ma N, Chen J, Zhang Y, Ai J. Propensity score-matched study and meta-analysis of cumulative outcomes of day 2/3 versus day 5/6 embryo transfers. Front Med. 2017 Dec;11(4):563-569.
5) Cornelisse S, Fleischer K, van der Westerlaken L, de Bruin JP, Vergouw C, Koks C, Derhaag J, Visser J, van Echten-Arends J, Slappendel E, et al. Cumulative live birth rate of a blastocyst versus cleavage stage embryo transfer policy during in vitro fertilisation in women with a good prognosis: multicentre randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2024 Sep 16;386:e080133.
6) Cameron NJ, Bhattacharya S, McLernon DJ. Cumulative live birth rates following blastocyst- versus cleavage-stage embryo transfer in the first complete cycle of IVF: a population-based retrospective cohort study. Hum Reprod. 2020 Oct 1;35(10):2365-2374.
7) Rifasky AM, Wardhani P, Sa'adi A, Darsini N, Lunardhi H, Faizah Z. Comparison of pregnancy rates on day 3 and day 5 embryo transfer in In Vitro Fertilization (IVF). Maj Obs Gin. 2021 Apr;29(1):14-17.
8) Shen X, Long H, Gao H, Guo W, Xie Y, Chen D, Cong Y, Wang Y, Li D, Si J, et al. The valuable reference of live birth rate in the single vitrified-warmed BB/BC/CB blastocyst transfer: the cleavage-stage embryo quality and embryo development speed. Front Physiol. 2020 Sep 10;11:1102.
9) Karacan M, Ulug M, Arvas A, Cebi Z, Berberoglugil M, Batukan M, Camlibel T. Comparison of the transfer of equal numbers of blastocysts versus cleavage-stage embryos after repeated failure of in vitro fertilization cycles. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2014 Mar;31(3):269-74.
10) Herbemont C, Sarandi S, Boujenah J, Cedrin-Durnerin I, Sermondade N, Vivot A, Poncelet C, Grynberg M, Sifer C. Should we consider day-2 and day-3 embryo morphology before day-5 transfer when blastocysts reach a similar good quality? Reprod Biomed Online. 2017 Nov;35(5):521-528.
11) Zhang J, Wang Y, Liu H, Mao X, Chen Q, Fan Y, Xiao Y, Kuang Y. Effect of in vitro culture period on birth weight after vitrified-warmed transfer cycles: analysis of 4,201 singleton newborns. Fertil Steril. 2019 Jan;111(1):97-104.
12) Smeenk J, Wyns C, De Geyter C, Kupka M, Bergh C, Cuevas Saiz I, De Neubourg D, Rezabek K, Tandler-Schneider A, Rugescu I, Goossens V; European IVF Monitoring Consortium (EIM) for the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE). ART in Europe, 2019: results generated from European registries by ESHRE. Hum Reprod. 2023 Dec 4;38(12):2321-2338.
13) Takahashi K, Mukaida T, Goto T, Oka C. Perinatal outcome of blastocyst transfer with vitrification using cryoloop: a 4-year follow-up study. Fertil Steril. 2005 Jul;84(1):88-92.
14) Rojas-Rueda S, Watanabe H, Abuhammoud S, Jurado CA, Alshehri A, Fu CC, Vegh D, Aldosary KM, Algamaiah H, Alshabib A. Fracture resistance of chairside cad/cam advanced lithium disilicate maxillary canine veneers with different incisal edge designs. Saudi Dent J. 2025 Jul 1;37:27.
15) Xiao JS, Healey M, Talmor A, Vollenhoven B. When only one embryo is available, is it better to transfer on Day 3 or to grow on? Reprod Biomed Online. 2019 Dec;39(6):916-923.
16) Neuhausser WM, Vaughan DA, Sakkas D, Hacker MR, Toth T, Penzias A. Non-inferiority of cleavage-stage versus blastocyst-stage embryo transfer in poor prognosis IVF patients (PRECISE trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Reprod Health. 2020 Jan 30;17(1):16.
