Diagnostic accuracy of serum lipase for acute pancreatitis in adults presenting to the emergency department: a systematic review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65759/0r1jtz35Abstract
Background: Acute pancreatitis (AP) requires rapid emergency department diagnosis, and LPS is widely used; uncertainty exist regarding optimal interpretation, especially for mild elevations. Our systematic review examined the diagnostic utility of serum lipase (LPS) for identifying AP in adults presenting with acute abdominal pain. Methods: This systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines to examine the diagnostic accuracy of LPS for AP in adults presenting to the ED with acute abdominal pain. Our data searches were performed in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. Prospective and retrospective diagnostic accuracy and cohort studies were eligible when AP was diagnosed using the Revised Atlanta Criteria. We assessed quality using QUADAS-2 on study design, population, lipase thresholds, and diagnostic performance, and methodology. Results: Seven studies were included, and LPS showed high diagnostic accuracy, with reported sensitivity/specificity of 93.9%/99.4% in one prospective study and 96.6%/99.0% in another study. Lipase reached 100% sensitivity within the first 24 hours of symptom onset and have higher sensitivity than amylase on days 2-3 (85% vs 68%). Data favored lipase over amylase because of its longer diagnostic window. Mild elevations represented an important gray zone among patients with lipase 80-240 IU/L, only 6.36% had AP, while 64% of emergency lipase orders in another study were redundant. Conclusions: LPS is a highly accurate first-line biomarker for diagnosing AP in adults in the ED. Its value is greatest when interpreted with clinical findings and the 3× upper-limit-of-normal threshold and selective imaging when presentation is inconclusive.
References
Althunayyan SM, Alali AK, Alanazi LK, Alkhalifah SS, Mashdali EM, Malabarey MA, et al. Emergency patients with mild elevations of serum lipase and acute pancreatitis. Saudi Med J. 2025 Apr;46(4):398-405.
Capurso G, Ponz de Leon Pisani R, Lauri G, Archibugi L, Hegyi P, Papachristou GI, et al. Clinical usefulness of scoring systems to predict severe acute pancreatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis with pre and post-test probability assessment. United European Gastroenterol J. 2023 Oct;11(8):825-842.
Chang K, Lu W, Zhang K, Jia S, Li F, Wang F, et al. Rapid urinary trypsinogen-2 test in the early diagnosis of acute pancreatitis: a meta-analysis. Clin Biochem. 2012 Sep;45(13-14):1051-6.
El Halabi M, Bou Daher H, Rustom LB, Marrache M, Ichkhanian Y, Kahil K, et al. Clinical utility and economic burden of routine serum lipase determination in the Emergency Department. Int J Clin Pract. 2019 Dec;73(12):e13409.
Ignjatović S, Majkić-Singh N, Mitrović M, Gvozdenović M. Biochemical evaluation of patients with acute pancreatitis. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2000 Nov;38(11):1141-4.
Jin T, Huang W, Jiang K, Xiong JJ, Xue P, Javed MA, et al. Urinary trypsinogen-2 for diagnosing acute pancreatitis: a meta-analysis. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2013 Apr 15;12(2):137-44.
Keim V, Teich N, Fiedler F, Hartig W, Thiele G, Mössner J. A comparison of lipase and amylase in the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis in patients with abdominal pain. Pancreas. 1998 Jan;16(1):45-9.
Komolafe O, Pereira SP, Davidson BR, Gurusamy KS. Serum C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, and lactate dehydrogenase for the diagnosis of pancreatic necrosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 21;4(4):CD012645.
McCarrick CA, Singaravelu A, Al Rasheed A, Murphy R. Evaluating the Role of Urinary Amylase in Diagnosing Acute Pancreatitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cureus. 2025 Dec 11;17(12):e98982.
Mofidi R, Suttie SA, Patil PV, Ogston S, Parks RW. The value of procalcitonin at predicting the severity of acute pancreatitis and development of infected pancreatic necrosis: systematic review. Surgery. 2009 Jul;146(1):72-81.
Møller-Petersen J, Klærke M, Dati F. Evaluation and comparison of cathodic trypsin-like immunoreactivity, pancreatic lipase and pancreatic isoamylase in the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis in 849 consecutive patients with acute abdominal pain. Clin Chim Acta. 1986 May 15;157(2):151-65
Pacheco RC, Nishioka SA, Oliveira LC. Validade da amilasemia e da lipasemia no diagnóstico diferencial entre pancreatite aguda/crônica agudizada e outras causas de dor abdominal aguda [Validity of serum amylase and lipase for the differential diagnosis between acute/acutized chronic pancreatitis and other causes of acute abdominal pain]. Arq Gastroenterol. 2003 Oct-Dec;40(4):233-8.
Rompianesi G, Hann A, Komolafe O, Pereira SP, Davidson BR, Gurusamy KS. Serum amylase and lipase and urinary trypsinogen and amylase for diagnosis of acute pancreatitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 21;4(4):CD012010.
Sun H, Jian S, Peng B, Hou J. Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography in the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies. Ann Transl Med. 2022 Apr;10(7):410.
van den Berg FF, de Bruijn AC, van Santvoort HC, Issa Y, Boermeester MA. Early laboratory biomarkers for severity in acute pancreatitis; A systematic review and meta-analysis. Pancreatology. 2020 Dec;20(8):1508-1517.
Viel JF, Foucault P, Bureau F, Albert A, Drosdowsky MA. Combined diagnostic value of biochemical markers in acute pancreatitis. Clin Chim Acta. 1990 Sep 14;189(2):191-8.
Zilio MB, Eyff TF, Azeredo-Da-Silva ALF, Bersch VP, Osvaldt AB. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the aetiology of acute pancreatitis. HPB (Oxford). 2019 Apr;21(4):391-400.


