Early Defibrillation for Ventricular Fibrillation Cardiac Arrest in the Emergency Department; Systematic Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65759/jfmshm27Keywords:
Emergency department, Ventricular fibrillation, Pulseless ventricular tachycardia, Early defibrillation, Time to shockAbstract
Background: Ventricular fibrillation (VF) and pulseless ventricular tachycardia (pVT) are time sensitive cardiac arrest rhythms where survival depends on rapid defibrillation. In the emergency department (ED), both out of hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) arrivals and in ED and in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) events may be encountered. The ED specific evidence base on early defibrillation is limited in ED cohorts and broader in hospital registries. Objective: our study aim to analyze original articles from PubMed Central on the association between early defibrillation and outcomes in VF and pVT cardiac arrest managed in ED settings. Methods: We followed PRISMA methods, structured question, reproducible search strategy, eligibility criteria, dual stage screening, standardized extraction, and narrative synthesis. We searched electronic databases for full-text on December 2026 for studies reporting VF and pVT arrests with a measurable defibrillation time variable (time to first shock, defibrillation within 2 minutes, or rhythm analysis before arrest team arrival). We included original human studies and excluded reviews, editorials, simulations, and single patient case reports. Results: Ten original studies met inclusion criteria, in ED-managed arrests, time to first defibrillation differ widely (median 2 to 3 minutes in one ED cohort with survivors vs non-survivors showing similar times, and 10 to 12 minutes in shockable cases in another ED based study). In a large adult IHCA registry analysis, defibrillation within 2 minutes was associated with better longer term survival reported as a 49% higher likelihood of 1 year survival. A pediatric IHCA registry analysis found no significant association between defibrillation time and survival to discharge. In Danish hospitals, rhythm analysis before cardiac arrest team arrival was associated with higher ROSC. Conclusion: our finding prioritize rapid defibrillation for VF/pVT, with strong adult in hospital registry signals favoring very early shocks (≤2 minutes), while ED-specific cohorts show variable timing and outcomes. Pediatric in-hospital data indicate that timing effects differ by age group or clinical context. Higher-quality ED-specific prospective studies were needed.
References
1. Hazinski MF. Measuring What Matters: CPR Quality and Resuscitation Outcomes. J Am Heart Assoc. 2014 Dec 17;3(6). doi: 10.1161/JAHA.114.001557
2. Merchant RM, Yang L, Becker LB, Berg RA, Nadkarni V, Nichol G, et al. Incidence of treated cardiac arrest in hospitalized patients in the United States*. Crit Care Med. 2011 Nov;39(11):2401–6.
3. Vancini-Campanharo CR, Vancini RL, Lira CAB de, Andrade M dos S, Góis AFT de, Atallah ÁN. Cohort study on the factors associated with survival post-cardiac arrest. Sao Paulo Med J. 2015 Oct 20;133(6):495–501.
4. Kim J sung, Bae HJ, Sohn CH, Cho SE, Hwang J, Kim WY, et al. Maximum emergency department overcrowding is correlated with occurrence of unexpected cardiac arrest. Crit Care. 2020 Dec 6;24(1):305. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-03019-w
5. Patel KK, Spertus JA, Khariton Y, Tang Y, Curtis LH, Chan PS, et al. Association Between Prompt Defibrillation and Epinephrine Treatment With Long-Term Survival After In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest. Circulation. 2018 May 8;137(19):2041–51. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.030488
6. Tantarattanapong S, Chantaramanee K. Comparison of Sustained Return of Spontaneous Circulation Rate Between Manual and Mechanical Chest Compression in Adult Cardiac Arrest. Open Access Emerg Med. 2022 Nov;Volume 14:599–608.
7. Skogvoll E, Nordseth T. The early minutes of in-hospital cardiac arrest: Shock or CPR? A population based prospective study. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2008;16(1):11. doi: 10.1186/1757-7241-16-11
8. Staerk M, Lauridsen KG, Krogh K, Løfgren B. Distribution and use of automated external defibrillators and their effect on return of spontaneous circulation in Danish hospitals. Resusc Plus. 2022 Mar;9:100211.
9. Hunt EA, Duval-Arnould JM, Bembea MM, Raymond T, Calhoun A, Atkins DL, et al. Association Between Time to Defibrillation and Survival in Pediatric In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest With a First Documented Shockable Rhythm. JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Sep 21;1(5):e182643. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.2643
10. Bradley SM, Huszti E, Warren SA, Merchant RM, Sayre MR, Nichol G. Duration of hospital participation in Get With the Guidelines-Resuscitation and survival of in-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation. 2012 Nov;83(11):1349–57.
11. Bradley SM, Liu W, Chan PS, Nallamothu BK, Grunwald GK, Self A, et al. Defibrillation time intervals and outcomes of cardiac arrest in hospital: retrospective cohort study from Get With The Guidelines-Resuscitation registry. BMJ. 2016 Apr 6;i1653.
12. Starks MA, Wu J, Peterson ED, Stafford JA, Matsouaka RA, Boulware LE, et al. In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Resuscitation Practices and Outcomes in Maintenance Dialysis Patients. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2020 Feb;15(2):219–27. doi: 10.2215/CJN.05070419
13. Khera R, Tang Y, Link MS, Krumholz HM, Girotra S, Chan PS. Association Between Hospital Recognition for Resuscitation Guideline Adherence and Rates of Survival for In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2019 Mar;12(3). doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.118.005429
