Trends in Cesarean Section Rates and Indications over the Last 5 Years in a Tertiary Center
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65759/cjywxd24Keywords:
cesarean section, Robson Ten Group Classification, tertiary hospital, indications, trendsAbstract
Background: Cesarean section (CS) is necessary and lifesaving in certain situations, but many tertiary centers report high and increasing use. Objective: To discuss articles on CS rates and indications in tertiary hospitals over the last five years. Methods: A PRISMA guided systematic review was conducted. We included English language, record based observational studies from tertiary centers reporting CS rates or indications with data covering at least one year within a recent five year window. We extracted data including (setting, study period, sample size, CS rate, indications, emergency and elective status, and Robson Ten-Group contributions). Findings were qualitatively synthesized. Results: Eight studies from Africa and Asia were included. CS rates ranged from 21.6% to 55.0%. One study reporting time points found increasing CS rates and rising maternal request CS. Where indications were reported, previous cesarean, uterine surgery and fetal distress were most frequent, while failure to progress and mal presentation also recurred. Four studies applied the Robson classification; Group 5 was the leading contributor. Conclusion: Recent tertiary center study found high CS rates, commonly driven by repeat CS and fetal status indications. Robson based audit and targeted efforts to reduce avoidable primary CS should be considered to improve safety and reduce variation.
References
1. Betrán AP, Vindevoghel N, Souza JP, Gülmezoglu AM, Torloni MR. A Systematic Review of the Robson Classification for Caesarean Section: What Works, Doesn’t Work and How to Improve It. Bhattacharya S, editor. PLoS One. 2014 Jun 3;9(6):e97769.
2. Abubeker FA, Gashawbeza B, Gebre TM, Wondafrash M, Teklu AM, Degu D, et al. Analysis of cesarean section rates using Robson ten group classification system in a tertiary teaching hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Dec 9;20(1):767.
3. Jenabi E, Khazaei S, Bashirian S, Aghababaei S, Matinnia N. Reasons for elective cesarean section on maternal request: a systematic review. J Matern Neonatal Med. 2020 Nov 16;33(22):3867–72.
4. Yang XJ, Sun SS. Comparison of maternal and fetal complications in elective and emergency cesarean section: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2017 Sep 5;296(3):503–12.
5. Jamshed S, Chien SC, Tanweer A, Asdary RN, Hardhantyo M, Greenfield D, et al. Correlation Between Previous Caesarean Section and Adverse Maternal Outcomes Accordingly With Robson Classification: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Med. 2022 Jan 10;8.
6. Chen I, Opiyo N, Tavender E, Mortazhejri S, Rader T, Petkovic J, et al. Non-clinical interventions for reducing unnecessary caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 28;2018(9).
7. Boatin A, Cullinane F, Torloni M, Betrán A. Audit and feedback using the Robson classification to reduce caesarean section rates: a systematic review. BJOG An Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018 Jan 17;125(1):36–42.
8. Bohren MA, Hofmeyr GJ, Sakala C, Fukuzawa RK, Cuthbert A. Continuous support for women during childbirth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jul 6;2017(8).
9. Bulut AN. Caesarean Indications and Rates in a Tertiary Center. Erciyes Med J. 2021.
10. Akadri AA, Imaralu JO, Salami OF, Nwankpa CC, Adepoju AA. Robson classification of caesarean births: implications for reducing caesarean section rate in a private tertiary hospital in Nigeria. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Apr 12;23(1):243.
11. Malik N, Kapoor B, Singh R, Sarkar R, Khan IA. Cesarean Section Trends and Associated Factors at a Tertiary Care Center in India: A Retrospective Study. Cureus. 2024 Nov 8.
12. Guner G, Karabudak CB. Caesarean section rates and indications: a cross-sectional study from a tertiary care centre in Türkiye. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Nov 24.
13. Barut A, Erkok U, Hassan HB. Cross-sectional analysis of caesarean sections according to the Robson 10-group classification system in Somalia. BMJ Open. 2025 Jan;15(1):e086525.
14. Adam H, Quarshie EL, Asubonteng GO, Sarpong EK, Opoku E, Ababio A, et al. Understanding caesarean section rate in a tertiary centre using the Robson classification system; a one-year retrospective study in Ghana. Discov Med. 2025 Sep 24;2(1):251.
15. Hussein AI, Kurtay S, Omar AA, Yusuf AA, Mohamud RYH. An Analysis of the Rate, Indications, and Associated Maternal Mortality for Cesarean Sections at a Tertiary Care Hospital, First Report from Somalia. Int J Womens Health. 2023 Feb;Volume 15:225–33.
16. Hoxha I, Syrogiannouli L, Luta X, Tal K, Goodman DC, da Costa BR, et al. Caesarean sections and for-profit status of hospitals: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2017 Feb 17;7(2):e013670.
17. El Radaf V, Campos LN, Savona-Ventura C, Mahmood T, Zaigham M. Robson ten group classification system for Caesarean sections across Europe: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2025 Feb;305:178–98.
