Respiratory Therapist Driven Ventilator Bundle Adherence And Patient Outcomes: Lung Protective Ventilation, Sedation Coordination, Oral Care, And Proning Implementation

Authors

  • Alaa Ahmed Alqattan Respiratory care services, Intensive Care Unit, King Saud University Medical City (KSUMC), Saudi Arabia, Riyadh Author
  • Reem Dhafer Alahmari Respiratory care services, Intensive Care Unit, King Saud University Medical City (KSUMC), Saudi Arabia, Riyadh Author
  • Waad Mohammed Hajib Respiratory care services, Intensive Care Unit, King Saud University Medical City (KSUMC), Saudi Arabia, Riyadh Author
  • Zahra Anwar Almarhoon Respiratory care services, Intensive Care Unit, King Saud University Medical City (KSUMC), Saudi Arabia, Riyadh Author
  • Yara Anwar Almutairy Respiratory care services, Intensive Care Unit, King Saud University Medical City (KSUMC), Saudi Arabia, Riyadh Author
  • Lamya Dhaifallah Alnakhli Respiratory care services, Intensive Care Unit, King Saud University Medical City (KSUMC), Saudi Arabia, Riyadh Author
  • Yahya Abdullah Otaif Audiology Department, King Saud University Medical City (KSUMC), Saudi Arabia, Riyadh Author
  • Mashael Abdulrahman Mahzari Renal dialysis unit, King Khalid University Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.65759/57f9kt71

Keywords:

Respiratory therapist, ventilator bundle, lung-protective ventilation, sedation interruption, ICU liberation

Abstract

Background: Respiratory therapist (RT) driven ventilator bundles promote lung-protective ventilation, sedation, oral care, VAP prevention, and proning coordination. We evaluated whether adherence to these elements is linked to better outcomes in mechanically ventilated adults. Methods: We systematically reviewed original studies identified from electronic databases. Eligible studies include ventilated adults and evaluated an RT-driven or RT-integrated bundle element, reporting adherence or clinical outcomes. Two reviewers screened and extracted data, and findings were synthesized narratively by bundle domain. Results: Eight studies met inclusion criteria in emergency department and ICU settings. Lung-protective ventilation initiatives improved adherence; some cohorts reported lower mortality and more VFD. ICU liberation approaches were associated with fewer delirium, early VAP events and shorter ventilation duration. VAP bundle audits showed higher compliance with lower VAP rates. Conclusion: RT-driven bundle adherence aligns with improved patient centered outcomes, although effects differ by component and study design. Standardized adherence definitions and risk adjusted evaluations are needed. 

Downloads

Published

2025-12-08